CaddieOpen in CaddieDownload for Mac

Showing pricing options upfront: VEED's A/B test

Shared by Caddie Library · Updated
Chapters show their main points

The bottom line

A paywall that showed yearly and monthly prices upfront beat one built around the benefits of Pro. Clear plan options can sell better than a feature pitch, and VEED saw 33% higher MRR from the change.

Key takeaways

  • Showing pricing options upfront beat a benefit-led paywall. Users convert more when they see their plan choices right away.
    • The benefit version highlighted no watermark, 4K export, clean audio, AI music and AI B-roll.
    • The winning version showed the yearly and monthly options first.
  • The pricing-led paywall lifted both trial and paid conversion. The gain held at two steps of the funnel.
    • Trial conversion rose 15%.
    • Conversion to paid rose 3%.
  • The revenue gains were larger than the conversion gains. Revenue per user rose along with the number of paying users.
    • MRR rose 33%.
    • ARPU rose 17%.

The test

Same paywall, different lead: prices versus Pro benefits
Pricing-firstBenefit-first
Leads withYearly and monthly plansBenefits of Pro
User sees firstPlan choices and pricesFeature list
Features shownSecondaryNo watermark, 4K, clean audio, AI music, AI B-roll
Selling approachMake the choice clearPitch premium value
OutcomeWon on every metricLost
VEED kept the upgrade offer the same and changed only what the paywall put first.

VEED compared a pricing-first paywall with a benefit-first paywall for upgrading to Pro.

  • The two versions differed in what they put first.
    • One showed the yearly and monthly pricing options upfront.
    • The other focused on the benefits of upgrading to Pro.
    • The benefit version listed paid features such as no watermark, 4K export, clean audio, AI music and AI B-roll.
Version A and version B as VEED tested them.
Version A and version B as VEED tested them. Screens from abtest.design.

The result

Showing prices upfront lifted MRR 33%
Trial conversion15%
Conversion to paid3%
MRR33%
ARPU17%
Conversion rose modestly, but revenue per user also climbed, so MRR grew most.

The pricing-focused version won on every metric reported.

  • Showing plan options clearly worked better than using the paywall mainly to sell premium features.
    • Trial conversion was 15% higher and conversion to paid 3% higher.
    • MRR was 33% higher and ARPU 17% higher.

In the growth library

VEED, Paywall & free trial test. VEED tested a paywall that showed yearly and monthly prices upfront against one that sold the benefits of Pro. The pricing-first version won on trial conversion, paid conversion, MRR and ARPU.

Lessons that draw on this:

More from abtest.design · The whole library, and ask it anything