The bottom line
Paid ads lift organic and branded search downloads that last-touch attribution credits to other sources, so measuring incrementality and cross-channel journeys shows what each channel is really worth. Budget can then move to the channels that add installs.
Key takeaways
- Paid marketing raises organic and branded search downloads. 2:08
- Calm, Headspace and Resume built high branded search volume through paid campaigns.
- Tinder and Hinge have more search volume than "dating", and Calm and Headspace more than "meditation". Stats like "63% of downloads come from search" are mostly branded search.
- Even a small Meta spend can nearly double organic sales. 3:31
- An indie app spent only $3,000 a month on Meta, starting in late August 2024. Its organic sales almost doubled by December 2024.
- No sales were attributed to Meta at first, so the lift never showed up as paid.
- True lift measurement shows how much each ad network adds beyond what it is credited. 5:43
- In the AppsFlyer dashboard, incrementality is 150 for Network A, 85 for Network B and zero for Network C. It can be drilled down to campaign level.
- Network A's classic attribution shows 234. Blending in incrementality changes the number to 156.
- Unified journeys give connected TV the credit that last-touch gives to search. 7:47
- A viewer sees a TV ad, searches the brand and clicks a branded Apple Search Ads campaign. Search Ads gets the credit and CTV looks near zero.
- The unified dashboard splits users and revenue across mobile, PC and CTV. In the example, PC drives much more revenue than CTV.
- Budget should follow incrementality, not cost per install. 7:06
- Network C may deliver a decent cost per install yet add no lift, so budget moves to A and B.
- Counting the lift on search downloads would push the true cost per acquisition well below what the dashboards show.
Calm and Headspace have more search volume than meditation. That's the value of running paid marketing.
Steve P. Young
Chapter summaries
0:00 AppsFlyer's release and the hidden lift from paid ads
Paid campaigns lift downloads that other channels get credit for, and AppsFlyer's new tooling is built to show that lift.
- AppsFlyer's biggest release yet has eight products, and two matter most to app marketers. 1:02
- It targets anyone running paid campaigns across CTV, web and mobile.
- The first of the two is true lift in user acquisition.
- Multi-channel just means multiple channels.
- The goal is to measure the incrementality of lead marketing efforts.
- Meta ads drive downloads that they never get credit for. 1:51
- People find the app through search or the store, so the credit lands elsewhere.
- AppsFlyer shows the lift by channel and by campaign.
- Branded search volume is called the "dirty little secret" for ASO.
- The lift appears as search incrementality growth.
3:16 An indie app shows the lift
In one indie app, organic sales rose with Meta spend while Meta itself showed almost no sales.
- ASO alone had already built a solid base before Meta. 3:31
- The app made about $42,000 in its first year.
- It peaked at about $5,000 a month.
- App Store sales were about $4,000, then about $7,000 a month by May 2024.
- Total sales alone would make ASO look like the only winner.
- Organic sales rise whenever Meta spend rises. 4:57
- As the green Meta line goes up, so does the blue organic line.
- Organic keeps climbing even when Meta stays flat.
- Downloads by source show none from Meta until the campaigns started.
- Meta grew only slightly, yet downloads rose a lot.
- The app had no social media presence, so the effect is clean. Bigger clients are a mess.
5:51 Incrementality by network and campaign
A cheap cost per install can hide a network that adds no real lift, and only incrementality shows it.
- A good cost per install can sit on top of zero lift. 6:11
- Network C may look decent on cost per install, so it is easy to keep funding.
- The same view can be drilled from network to campaign.
- The dashboard is organized by experiment date, so each test can be read on its own.
- Network A is called one of the best, and B "pretty decent".
- Before this tool, measuring the lift meant a hacked-together spreadsheet. 7:12
- It compared the installs Meta reported with the installs App Store Connect showed from Meta.
- That was not true incrementality, only a rough check.
- Counting the bump on search downloads would push cost per acquisition lower still.
7:47 Unified journeys credit the first touch
When one view links every device and channel, the ad that started the journey gets credit, not the last click.
- Running many channels at once makes it hard to know which one works. 7:56
- Some bigger clients run connected TV, SEM, ASO, Apple Search Ads and Meta together.
- Last touch makes Apple Search Ads look strong and connected TV look minimal.
- The unified view finds the initial touch point and credits it. 10:03
- It works even when a user has several touch points.
- Connected TV used to look close to zero. It now shows results without manual work.
- A branded search campaign set up to protect the brand takes the credit. Organic can take it too.
10:14 Why indies should watch new releases
New measurement products preview the problems that appear at larger scale.
- Studying new products shows what problems are coming. 10:31
- Even teams not ready for this sophistication can see which problems the tools solve.
- Mobile marketing changes almost every day, month and year.
- All eight releases are worth a look, if only to learn what's coming next.
In the growth library
Steve P. Young, Founder of App Masters, an app marketing agency. Paid ads such as Meta lift branded organic search and downloads, but last-touch attribution gives them no credit, so incrementality and cross-platform journey measurement are needed to judge channels fairly. An indie app spending $3,000 a month on Meta almost doubled its organic sales, which shows how much paid impact standard reports miss.
Lessons that draw on this:
More from
App Masters · The whole library, and ask it anything